● Introduction of Lawyer Liu Wuchuan

Lawyer Liu Wuchuan obtained legal qualifications in 2000 and is currently practicing at Beijing Guantang Law Firm. Lawyer Liu has a deep foundation in legal theory and rich experience in handling cases. He is sincere and humble, rigorous and responsible in his work, and has always adhered to the personal purpose of "being entrusted by others and loyal to others".

When handling litigation affairs, by accurately grasping the direction of litigation, conducting in-depth investigation and evidence collection, and skillfully applying case handling skills, he has successfully represented multiple litigation cases and often achieved the litigation objectives of the parties involved. When dealing with non- litigation legal affairs, he can conduct thorough and meticulous investigations and analysis, organically combine legal risk control with the commercial goals of the parties, and strive to find the best legal solution for the parties.

Lawyer Liu has represented a large number of cases and has rich judicial practice experience. Especially skilled in criminal defense, property disputes, contract disputes, marriage inheritance, land acquisition and demolition, and other related businesses. In his work, he always takes safeguarding the legitimate interests of the parties involved as the foundation and is diligent and responsible. Lawyer Liu, with years of case handling skills and strong sense of responsibility, has provided high-quality and efficient legal services to the parties and won widespread praise from the parties.

● Represented Cases

1. (2022) Jing 0102 Min Chu No.8910, Disputes over education and training contracts. The plaintiff sued to terminate the contract and refund the training fee. Through communication with the opposing party through a proxy lawyer, both parties reached a settlement, and the other party closed the case by withdrawing the lawsuit without paying legal fees.

2. (2021) Jing 0107 Min Chu No. 18406, Sales Contract Dispute. The plaintiff sued for payment of the goods. Through communication between the lawyer and the opposing lawyer, the opposing party voluntarily withdrew the lawsuit.

3. (2021) Ji 1082 Min Chu 1239, Lease Contract Dispute. The plaintiff sued for the termination of the contract, a refund of rent, management fees, and security deposit. The court accepted the lawyer's opinion and dismissed the plaintiff's claim.

4. (2020) Ji 1082 Min Chu No. 11021, Contract Dispute. The plaintiff sued for a double deposit refund and compensation for direct economic losses. The court accepted the lawyer's agency opinion, which claimed that the defendant did not have any breach of contract, and dismissed the plaintiff's lawsuit.

5. (2020) Jing 0101 Xing Chu No. 777, Crime of Appropriating Public Funds. Employees of state-owned companies, taking advantage of their position, misappropriate public funds for personal use. The court partially adopted the defense counsel's opinion and imposed a lenient punishment on the defendant.

6. (2020) Zhe 0304 Min Chu No. 7384, Contract Dispute. The village committee illegally bought and sold collective land without legal procedures. The agreement signed by the village committee is invalid.

7. (2020) Zhe 0304 Min Chu No. 7383, Contract Dispute. The village committee illegally bought and sold collective land without legal procedures. The court accepted the lawyer's opinion and ultimately confirmed that the agreement it signed was invalid.

8. (2018) Su 04 Xing Zhong No.501, crime of refusing to execute judgments or orders. The company refuses to execute the court's effective judgment, and the company and its legal representative are held criminally responsible. The defender provided a detailed defense regarding the filing procedures, legal provisions, and specific applications involved in the crime of refusing to execute judgments and orders.

9. (2019) Zhe 0302 Min Chu No. 10883, Contract Dispute. The plaintiff claims that the agreement is valid and demands continued performance. The court accepted the lawyer's opinion and dismissed his lawsuit.

10. (2018) Zhe 0304 Xing Chu No. 263, Administrative Compulsory. In the absence of a compensation agreement, the local street office and local law enforcement bureau jointly forced the demolition of citizens' houses. The court accepted the lawyer's opinion and confirmed that the joint demolition was illegal.

11. (2018) Zhe 0304 Xing Chu No. 212, Administrative Compulsory. Local street offices and local law enforcement bureaus jointly forcibly demolish buildings built by citizens. The lawyer believes that the forced eviction procedure is illegal, and the final court adopts the lawyer's opinion to confirm that the joint forced eviction is illegal.